tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post114558354181718267..comments2023-10-18T11:04:13.946-04:00Comments on Connecticut Local Politics: Lots of News Open ForumGenghis Connhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13042849182723767087noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post-1145641477496255702006-04-21T13:44:00.000-04:002006-04-21T13:44:00.000-04:00Truthy,Don't worry about Neds Ride.In 2007 he'll b...Truthy,<BR/><BR/>Don't worry about Neds Ride.In 2007 he'll be driven by that same retired state trooper in the car you get to open and close the door to now.ctkeithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10225806283179995491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post-1145630538292018702006-04-21T10:42:00.000-04:002006-04-21T10:42:00.000-04:00I just wanted to let Truthy Know I was Devastated ...I just wanted to let Truthy Know I was Devastated That Lamont didn't think Lieberman was a whiny-ass titty baby but not suprised He didn't think Joe was a douchebag or an ass clown.After all douchebags and ass clowns have a use.ctkeithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10225806283179995491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post-1145628910912463182006-04-21T10:15:00.000-04:002006-04-21T10:15:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Aldon Hyneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00527868669926331034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post-1145618816263074422006-04-21T07:26:00.000-04:002006-04-21T07:26:00.000-04:00You know what else is interesting about that poll?...You know what else is interesting about that poll? <A HREF="http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollTrack.aspx?g=5b2ae37d-ddb3-43ce-9ef4-f463f260dbe9&x=752,3" REL="nofollow">Among Liberals</A> (presumably who would be voting in a Democratic primary), Lieberman's numbers have actually crossed the rubicon and his approval/disapproval is 46/49!<BR/><BR/>Mod.Dem.JFK - If you didn't like the numbers above, you <I>really</I> aren't going to like these - MOE is +/- 9.2.<BR/><BR/>Two points about MOE:<BR/><BR/>1. Its natural that, when breaking down a poll into segments based on characteristics, the MOE gets pretty high when you look at individual segments. The way around this is to over sample the specific groups you want numbers for; here, SUSA wanted to break down every possible segment - it would have been prohibitively expensive to over sample each of the groups to keep the MOE managable.<BR/><BR/>2. If you are focus on the trend lines rather than the actual numbers, the MOE becomes largely irrelevent. The 49% percent mentioned above may not be totally accurate, but the fact that it is significantly less than it was 6 or 12 months ago is less subject to the MOE than a solid number is.Gabehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14313270027747810794noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post-1145593516140819982006-04-21T00:25:00.000-04:002006-04-21T00:25:00.000-04:00Patricia Rice,Isn't some old guy with Alzheimers i...Patricia Rice,<BR/><BR/>Isn't some old guy with Alzheimers in need of your talents?<BR/><BR/><BR/>Truth Squad,<BR/><BR/>When this is all over those ill fitted suits will finally be replaced by robes which hide alot of sins.I think they'll be a better fit.ctkeithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10225806283179995491noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10214263.post-1145589845910693662006-04-20T23:24:00.000-04:002006-04-20T23:24:00.000-04:00mod.dem.like.jfk,We'll just call you Matt if thats...mod.dem.like.jfk,<BR/><BR/>We'll just call you Matt if thats OK.<BR/><BR/>I didn't notice you complaining about Survey USA (which had the best #s in 04 if I remember correctly)when your Daddy wasn't in Freefall.ctkeithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10225806283179995491noreply@blogger.com